Um. Way to be self-sabotaging fandom! Hating people who are actively participating in fandom just because they're participating is not going to help anything. And what's up with the personal vendettas against BNFs? There's this really nifty feature called the scroll button when you don't want to read something.
Anyway, some people defend hate memes because they're like, the only opportunity for non-BNFs to be heard and anonymous commenting levels the playing field or something. Yes, it totally sucks that lj is more of a popularity contest than a cohesive community, but seriously, if you're yourself are actually involved in fandom, can you not see the good in encouraging everyone to participate? Because it seems to me that a lot of times creative people play off of each other and encouraging that should never, ever be a bad thing. One thing I do wish though, is that some of the stuff brought up in the hate threads could actually be discussed outside of the context of petty, spiteful commentary.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I really try to leave feedback for everything I enjoyed reading, but if it's a writer who I know doesn't respond to feedback, I usually won't bother. Above and beyond any considerations of fandom etiquette and politeness, not responding to feedback (at least to me) seems to indicate a certain level of indifference towards even getting feedback at all.
And personally, I like writing feedback, I like picking out what I loved, and telling writers exactly what worked for me. So I usually spend a good amount of time trying to construct something more than a quick "thanks!" (not that there's anything wrong with doing that, sometimes it's all I have time for too.) Fandom is a reciprocal culture, if I don't feel like the time I put into feedback is appreciated, I won't leave it. And more than that, feedback is pretty much the best opportunity for readers to interact with writers, it's how a lot of meta gets discussed, and how a lot of people meet new friends. I don't think every writer has to automatically make friends with all of their reviewers, but I think it's nice when the channels of communication are at least open to that, even if all it is is a standard thank you reply, at least that's something.
Some of the best meta discussions I've had have come out of feedback threads,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
(stealing
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
- Mood:
curious
Comments
Before this post I really hadn't thought much more than that I think it's polite to respond to the fedback you get, although I've never expected that all authors will have either the time on inclination to do so. 120 comments later, I still think it's more favorable to respond to feedback, but I think the reason why has changed. While I will always believe that saying thank you and you're welcome are completely warranted in all exchanges (of compliments, gifts, or whatever other analogy one might apply to feedback,) responding to feedback isn't just about being polite, it's also about ackowledgment. Most readers are just that, readers. And while a lot of them try to take on other fannish activities, on the whole, readers are always going to feel like second class citizens in a culture built around the ability to write (and vid and draw, etc.) Livejournal is based around written communication and a system of comments, replies, and counter-replies. When an author consistently fails to acknowledge their readers it frustrates me and it disappoints me.
Not all writers are going to have time to reply to all of their comments and keep communication going. And that's fine with me. But I think even then, it's far more preferable for them to address their lack of reply in some manner than it is for them to ignore the issue entirely. If the sga_hate meme was anything to go by, silence, in this case, breeds contempt. I don't think a lack of response to my feedback is a personal slight. I'm never going to go around saying I hate _____ because they didn't respond to meeeeeee! I'm never going to start keeping track of whether or not an author replies to my feedback, but if I start to notice the habit, I'm probably always going to be less inclined to leave them detailed feedback in the future.